The World According to cRitter
This article is ridiculous. What you seem to not realize is that the corporations are the ones who are making the rules with regulations to keep the competition out.We have a government who works for the corporations and not the people. That is corporatism, or facism.
I agree with you completely (with the exception of your first line). The solution is not to roll back Democracy 200 years but to advance it by Opening the Source to the people.
Interesting that you missed the mark so completely.Look now at the amount of money that PAC's and Lobbyist give to campaigns.Do you think it is only happenstance they give so much to politicians and don't expect anything back?Of course they get something back and are willing to pay big bucks for that access.Give me a break, Fascism, which is what our country has right now, is what you are concerned about and yet it is already here.In Texas, Governor Rick Perry attempted to ram down the throats of Texans a drug designed only for young women to prevent HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) making it mandatory for my daughter to have this vaccine even if I didn't want her too. Guess why? Corporate influence via campaign contributions.Go to the www.fec.gov and look at how much money, Clinton, Obama and Edwards got from PAC's and Lobbyist. Or check on the amount of money Giuliani or Thompson got.Heck Fred Thompson WAS one of those lobbyists. Fascism becomes more difficult when you have to deal with governments on a state by state basis.By reducing the amount of money that the federal government can take from the tax payers the less incentive the Lobbyist have of influencing them.I don't know who you listened to on the otherside of this issue, but if you think that Ron Paul is handing our nation over to corporations, you missed they boat. They have that access now and will fight him to prevent his becoming President.Watch in the next two months as certain businesses start the cry that Ron Paul is anti american, or something to that effect.
I'm not advocating any character assassination on the part of Ron Paul. He has a history of cutting the most fat from Government as any modern politician could claim.However, it's irresponsible to take his good nature to the extreme, where 200+ years of Democratic advancement would be systematically undone in response to the overly pervasive corruption.I'll say it again: Open Source is the Solution. Allow the people access to every level so that "corporate influence" would require that everyone gets their own private leer jet.
You're absolutely wrong, with a constitutional republic, where everything is in the hands of private individuals (i.e. schools, hospitals, etc), but the law is still democratically created, the people retain full rights.THe key is the law and police, as long as they're created democratically and not by private hands, then justice will be blind and impartial.
"This huge conspiracy that the eradication of Government is the only path to Freedom is a myth. The Government is Our Voice!"You're so wrong! It's actually shocking! Government is the institution of force and coercion. Government is the mechanism by the which people put restrictive bounds on each other. When people use government to limit each other's liberty (example: people voting in a government that imprisons other people for smoking marijuana, or ingesting cancer treatments not yet gone through the FDA approval process), that is evil: that is tyranny. Since government is the institution of force and coercion, it must be limited. Taxes are the greatest form of tyranny there is. For a government to take away 30% of the fruits of your labor is a gross infringment of your liberty.
"Since government is the institution of force and coercion, it must be limited."If you're not aware of what's being done to you: the Corporations are currently promoting a number of presidential options to see which sells better to the general public. However, you're not considering the Open Source solution. Instead, you're falling into the "Anti-Marketing Market" which makes Ron Paul so appealing. As the voice of the people we must work to support an Open Source government, along with the control an Open Source government has over the increasingly more powerful Corporations.To hand over the most critical elements of our society to the likes of Microsoft and Wal-Mart is absolute insanity.
"If you're not aware of what's being done to you: the Corporations are currently promoting a number of presidential options to see which sells better to the general public."Corporations have a right to promote anything they want. Corporations are merely a coop made up of a group of people, and since people have a right to freedom, they have a right to make any social arrangement they wish, including a corporation, and through it engage in any non-coercive business activity or campaigning they wish. It is up to the people to stay informed and not be misled by selfish political propaganda, and instead support politicians that limit government (coercion).
"Corporations are merely a coop made up of a group of people, and since people have a right to freedom."Democracy was intended to give the power to the individual so that they would no longer be subjugated to the control of the rich and powerful. We used to call them Monarchies, but in today's world it is the Corporations who exert pressure on entire nations of people -- a far cry from the individuals you compare their rights to.
"Democracy was intended to give the power to the individual so that they would no longer be subjugated to the control of the rich and powerful."Yes, that is exactly why I wrote:"Corporations are merely a coop made up of a group of people, and since people have a right to freedom, they have a right to make any social arrangement they wish, including a corporation, and through it engage in any non-coercive business activity or campaigning they wish."Note the term "non-coercive business activities".If the activities of the corporations wade into the realm of coercion or fraud, then it is the job of the democratically appointed justice system that to use the coercive powers of the state to punish the corporation and force it to give compensation to the victim. As long as the activities of corporations are non-coercive, they should not be interfered with.
I take it you've missed the latter half of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st.
Post a Comment
11 comments:
This article is ridiculous. What you seem to not realize is that the corporations are the ones who are making the rules with regulations to keep the competition out.
We have a government who works for the corporations and not the people. That is corporatism, or facism.
I agree with you completely (with the exception of your first line).
The solution is not to roll back Democracy 200 years but to advance it by Opening the Source to the people.
Interesting that you missed the mark so completely.
Look now at the amount of money that PAC's and Lobbyist give to campaigns.
Do you think it is only happenstance they give so much to politicians and don't expect anything back?
Of course they get something back and are willing to pay big bucks for that access.
Give me a break, Fascism, which is what our country has right now, is what you are concerned about and yet it is already here.
In Texas, Governor Rick Perry attempted to ram down the throats of Texans a drug designed only for young women to prevent HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) making it mandatory for my daughter to have this vaccine even if I didn't want her too. Guess why? Corporate influence via campaign contributions.
Go to the www.fec.gov and look at how much money, Clinton, Obama and Edwards got from PAC's and Lobbyist. Or check on the amount of money Giuliani or Thompson got.
Heck Fred Thompson WAS one of those lobbyists.
Fascism becomes more difficult when you have to deal with governments on a state by state basis.
By reducing the amount of money that the federal government can take from the tax payers the less incentive the Lobbyist have of influencing them.
I don't know who you listened to on the otherside of this issue, but if you think that Ron Paul is handing our nation over to corporations, you missed they boat. They have that access now and will fight him to prevent his becoming President.
Watch in the next two months as certain businesses start the cry that Ron Paul is anti american, or something to that effect.
I'm not advocating any character assassination on the part of Ron Paul. He has a history of cutting the most fat from Government as any modern politician could claim.
However, it's irresponsible to take his good nature to the extreme, where 200+ years of Democratic advancement would be systematically undone in response to the overly pervasive corruption.
I'll say it again: Open Source is the Solution. Allow the people access to every level so that "corporate influence" would require that everyone gets their own private leer jet.
You're absolutely wrong, with a constitutional republic, where everything is in the hands of private individuals (i.e. schools, hospitals, etc), but the law is still democratically created, the people retain full rights.
THe key is the law and police, as long as they're created democratically and not by private hands, then justice will be blind and impartial.
"This huge conspiracy that the eradication of Government is the only path to Freedom is a myth. The Government is Our Voice!"
You're so wrong! It's actually shocking! Government is the institution of force and coercion. Government is the mechanism by the which people put restrictive bounds on each other. When people use government to limit each other's liberty (example: people voting in a government that imprisons other people for smoking marijuana, or ingesting cancer treatments not yet gone through the FDA approval process), that is evil: that is tyranny.
Since government is the institution of force and coercion, it must be limited. Taxes are the greatest form of tyranny there is. For a government to take away 30% of the fruits of your labor is a gross infringment of your liberty.
"Since government is the institution of force and coercion, it must be limited."
If you're not aware of what's being done to you: the Corporations are currently promoting a number of presidential options to see which sells better to the general public.
However, you're not considering the Open Source solution. Instead, you're falling into the "Anti-Marketing Market" which makes Ron Paul so appealing.
As the voice of the people we must work to support an Open Source government, along with the control an Open Source government has over the increasingly more powerful Corporations.
To hand over the most critical elements of our society to the likes of Microsoft and Wal-Mart is absolute insanity.
"If you're not aware of what's being done to you: the Corporations are currently promoting a number of presidential options to see which sells better to the general public."
Corporations have a right to promote anything they want. Corporations are merely a coop made up of a group of people, and since people have a right to freedom, they have a right to make any social arrangement they wish, including a corporation, and through it engage in any non-coercive business activity or campaigning they wish.
It is up to the people to stay informed and not be misled by selfish political propaganda, and instead support politicians that limit government (coercion).
"Corporations are merely a coop made up of a group of people, and since people have a right to freedom."
Democracy was intended to give the power to the individual so that they would no longer be subjugated to the control of the rich and powerful.
We used to call them Monarchies, but in today's world it is the Corporations who exert pressure on entire nations of people -- a far cry from the individuals you compare their rights to.
"Democracy was intended to give the power to the individual so that they would no longer be subjugated to the control of the rich and powerful."
Yes, that is exactly why I wrote:
"Corporations are merely a coop made up of a group of people, and since people have a right to freedom, they have a right to make any social arrangement they wish, including a corporation, and through it engage in any non-coercive business activity or campaigning they wish."
Note the term "non-coercive business activities".
If the activities of the corporations wade into the realm of coercion or fraud, then it is the job of the democratically appointed justice system that to use the coercive powers of the state to punish the corporation and force it to give compensation to the victim.
As long as the activities of corporations are non-coercive, they should not be interfered with.
I take it you've missed the latter half of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st.
Post a Comment